George
Osborne might have left Number 11, but his legacy, for the moment, lives
on……just. Many of his policies and plans are gone in less than 6 months. And
let us not forget that it is his own political party that have ripped up what
has gone before
The
one of the few constants that remains is the advent of his dream child……the Lifetime
ISA (LISA). It is due to launch in April 2017 for the under-40’s (age
discrimination anyone?) and will bring a brand new way to save for the long
term.
Technical
details about LISA are (at best) slow to emerge……but the cloud is thinning as
we get closer to the launch date. Over the last few weeks the Treasury has
issued a couple of updated technical notes which fill in a number of the blanks
on exactly how LISA will work. And soon we will get the detailed regulations
accompanying the Bill which creates the legislative framework (the Savings
(Government Contributions) Bill 2016 for those who would like to join my ‘nerd
club’).
The
general headlines are:
- LISA can start at any
age between 18 to 40.
- Up to £4,000 a year
may be invested up to age 50.
- The Government will
add a bonus each year worth 25% of the amount invested.
One
of the big issues currently is that there is so much missing information /
legislation that LISA providers cannot put together a LISA proposition and back
office systems. And the clock is ticking with less than 6 months until launch.
However,
the biggest issue of all is that LISA will only pay out charge / penalty free
on a purchase of a first home or from age 60. If someone wants to get hold of
their LISA funds before either of these events, then they will not only lose
the government bonus (and any growth on it) but they will also have to pay a
hefty 5% penalty on the value of the LISA withdrawal.
Let’s
be fair, pensions are a huge turn off for the under-40’s because they are
incredibly complicated and can’t be accessed until age 55. Putting access
barriers / penalties in place puts LISA in the same ‘turn off’ category as
pensions. Why not go the whole hog and call them Pensions!!!!
LISA
was never designed to replace pension savings but the message and restrictive
penalties certainly make LISAs and Pensions difficult to differentiate.
Who
knows, we might just have a Chancellor that provides some pleasant surprises in
the Autumn Statement to clearly differentiate. Emphasis on the word ‘might’
obviously.
We
live in hope.
I am glad there are restrictions and penalties because this plan has a purpose and it seems a necessary focus is required otherwise there will be no monetary future for many.. Especially if the the state support becomes necessarily restricted!!! Prisen Bars will not hold a person as securely as Poverty! Especially in Old Age...
ReplyDelete