The
Brexit plots thickens!
Theresa
May has held firm that Brexit means Brexit and she was to flex her ministerial
muscles to determine when and how Article 50 was triggered without the need for
MPs to have a voice or vote.
Campaigners
called this unconstitutional and the High Court agreed……meaning that Parliament
must vote on whether the UK can start the process of leaving the EU……not
Theresa May or anyone else on a Westminster whim.
From
Theresa May’s perspective, she had 3 objectives she was running with:
1. Hold her negotiating
cards close to her chest.
2. Make sure MPs didn’t
have some kind of vote veto on the negotiations.
3. Delivering the
Article 50 ‘moment’ at the date she said she would.
Given
the High Court ruling, all 3 objectives are now under threat……no surprise that
she has appealed the ruling and this will be considered by the court at the
start of December.
Assuming
the appeal is thrown out (and it should be), what will MPs do?
Interestingly,
3 out of 4 MPs backed remain but continuing with such a theme would mean
Westminster taking on the people / voters and going against the result. What a
predicament.
We
are only a short way through our march to Brexit, yet already things are
incredibly complicated!
Brexit
walks into a bar. The barman says "why the long farce?"
This
could be a long drawn out story!
Steve even though 3 out of 4 MPs voted to remain I doubt they will go against the referendum result. However as the sovreign body they must be allowed to bebate the exir and under what terms we leave. After all we had the sovreignty ticket rammed down our throats continuously during the referendum.
ReplyDelete