I’ve
thought long and hard about this one over the past week……pondered, counter
pondered and undertaken a number of significant head scratching sessions……and I
think I’ve got my head around it. Kind of. Sort of. Definitely. Perhaps……
The
Story……
The
incoming Governor of the Bank of England (Canadian Mark Carney) has hit the
ground running and launched a series of interest rate policies that have
grabbed the headlines. Namely, that interest rates will not rise until
unemployment in the UK drops to 7.0%.
Given
that the current rate is 7.8% and has not fallen to 7.0% since 1998, this is a
good thing right? Well, actually no.
The
Science Bit……
The
Bank of England’s remit is to control inflation so that the real value of money
is not eroded in a boom / bust scenario (think Brazil, Russia). This is
undertaken by manipulating interest rates. Where inflation looks to be
increasing, they can put less money in our pockets by increasing interest rates
and reduce how much we spend (thus inflation reduces as a consequence).
Conversely, they can put more money in our pockets by reducing interest rates,
we spend more and inflation rises.
But
the new approach of linking unemployment to interest rates creates many
problems. The list is huge, but here is my top 3.
Problem
#1
The
graph highlights that unemployment and inflation are not correlated. So in
essence, we are using a measure to determine whether interest rates should rise
/ fall that has very limited value. Or to put that another way, we might as
well use the direction of the wind as it’s equally as useful!
Problem
# 2
The
rate of unemployment is a political hot potato as every Government wants to
manipulate the figures to reduce the headline rate and every opposition party
wants to manipulate to increase it. The actual rate of unemployment is down to
successful political slipperiness. Is this really the right measure to
determine interest rates?
Problem
# 3
We
save less per head than any other developed nation in the world. When the real
value of money is eroded if savings interest rates are lower than the rate of
inflation, where is the incentive to save for the long term?
And
I could go on and on……but you get the picture.
Well,
it’s certainly a radical approach and couldn’t be any more different to the
more traditional stance of the previous Governor, (far from) Marvellous Mervyn
King.
Better
the devil you know? We shall see.
Time
will tell.
No comments:
Post a Comment