This month’s Budget from Rachel Reeves was a stark reminder of how far-reaching the aftermath of the 2022 mini-budget truly was (you remember……the 49 day Liz Truss experiment).
Since that farcical period, every Budget has
had to be carefully trialled, tested and market-proofed in advance. Not because
Government has suddenly discovered a love of complete transparency……but because
the alternative was truly exposed by Liz Truss. Uncosted and untested
announcements can send markets spiralling, damage confidence and leave
long-lasting scars on the economy.
Whatever one’s politics, the legacy of the
Truss Budget is clear. It fundamentally changed how future Chancellor’s
approach economic policymaking. This month’s Budget was all about a Government
taking no chances……briefing, signalling and reassuring well before stepping up
to the dispatch box. And then for good measure, making sure any significant
changes are kicked down the road to retain the status quo in the meantime.
Why?
Answer 1: The UK Government plans
to borrow around £304 billion through gilt issuance (bonds to you and I)
in this tax year……the second highest on record. The more untrustworthy /
radical Rachel Reeves appeared in the Budget, the more the bond market would
react negatively and the cost to borrow £304 billion would go up……which
creates a further black hole……which creates the need for more tax rises.
Never underestimate the power of the bond
market. It cost Liz Truss her job……The Trump had to loosen his hard stance in
April on his Tariff whirlwind. Bond markets have licence to kill bad choices.
So all eyes were on the bond market response to
the Budget……the reaction……the biggest reduction in the cost of borrowing on the
bond market on Budget day for 20 years. Or to put that another
way……the bond market liked it.
Answer 2: And now for the cherry
on the Reeves cake……this almost certainly saved her job at a time when the
backbenchers were lining up with stones to throw.
Politics and personal gain before the greater
need of the country. I was hoping for more but got what I expected.
The Numbers
The last time there was this much speculation
about which taxes will go up in a Budget was, well, last year’s Budget. To have
two major tax-raising events within the first 18 months of a new Government is
unprecedented and it tells us something important: Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ first
Budget didn’t do the job.
So why the sense of constant crisis? It is
almost entirely self-inflicted, thanks to the Chancellor’s decision to meet her
crucial fiscal rules by such a narrow margin. It is like setting off on a 100 mile
journey with only 102 miles worth of fuel in the tank. When the buffer against
unexpected shocks is so small, every minor change in the forecasts sparks
speculation about another round of tax rises to get back in the black. This is
a cycle that is presently on repeat every six months.
By establishing meaningful fiscal headroom
there is a clear path to ending the cycle of speculation and instability, but
it will take political bravery and a clear story about the gain that will come
from the pain. Policial bravery is not what this Government is about though.
Instead there was a ‘smorgasbord’ of
announcements:
- Income tax thresholds have been frozen for
another 3 years until 2030 / 2031, which will push more than 1
million extra people into higher rates of income tax as wages rise.
- An increase in the national living wage of 4.1%
to £12.71 an hour has been confirmed. The national minimum wage rate for
those aged 18 to 20 will increase by 8.5% to £10.85 an hour.
- Pension contributions made through salary
sacrifice schemes above an annual £2,000 threshold will no longer be
free of national insurance contributions from April 2029. The measure is
expected to raise £4.7 billion in 2029 / 2030.
- An annual surcharge will be applied to homes
valued at more than £2 million from April 2028. The measure is expected
to raise £400 million in 2029 / 2030.
- The two-child benefit cap has been scrapped
from 2026. The measure is expected to cost £2.3 billion in 2026 / 2027.
- Green levies will be removed from energy
bills from next year until 2029, expected to cost about £2.3 billion.
- The amount of money that can be saved tax free
each year in a Cash ISA has been cut to £12,000 from April 2027
(currently £20,000). Those aged over 65 will retain the full cash
allowance.
- Tax rates on dividends, property and savings
income will be increased by 2%, raising £2.1 billion by 2029 /
2030.
- Tax rates for 750,000 retail and
leisure properties will reduce, set to be paid for by an increase in rates on
properties worth £500,000 or more. The measures will reduce tax receipts
by £1.2 billion on average each year.
- Electric vehicle drivers will be charged 3p
per mile on top of other road taxes from 2028 / 2029. The average driver of a
battery electric car driving 8,500 miles is therefore expected to be charged £255
a year.
- Rail fares have been frozen for a year,
promising to save commuters on the more expensive routes more than £300
per year,
- Alcohol duty will rise in line with retail
price inflation from February and a flat-rate excise duty of £2.20 per 10ml
on all vaping liquid will come into effect from October 2026.
Elsewhere, away from the ‘fun’ of the Budget……
86% of the licence fee we pay goes directly
into funding BBC……can you imagine a scenario that we have to pay a higher
licence fee to cover the cost of the compensation to The Trump!
And my favourite number of the month was……7……games
in a row unbeaten and the first medal of the season for my favourite netballer!
There could only be one winner this month……Rachel
Jane Reeves.
However, when you put your own job before the
greater need and good of the country, you lose all credibility. Most of the
significant changes are to come in 2 – 3 years to safeguard her political
future in the meantime.
If a Government with a majority as big as this
one isn’t brave enough to try something that will drive growth with the tax
system, I don’t know when we will see it. Shameful stuff.
Which leads me on to the Peter Principle.
It is a management theory that states: in a
hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to their level of incompetence. In
other words, people are promoted based on success in their current role until
they reach a position where their skills no longer match the job requirement
and they stop advancing.
We saw it with Liz Truss. We are now seeing it
with Rachel Reeves. They rose to their level of incompetence in view of us all.
Trump Lunacy Rating: 10 / 10
And Finally……
“Good followers do not become good
leaders.”
Laurence J. Peter




No comments:
Post a Comment