If
ever there was a contradiction in just 14 letters, here it is……‘MP
Transparency’.
I
wrote about the issues with the lack of transparency with MP’s business and
family business interests (Tax Transparency: http://stevesmithlive.blogspot.co.uk/2016/04/tax-transparency.html
) back in April 2016. This lack of openness always leaves me questioning the
real motives behind how an MP votes…….For the greater good? For their own good?
For the good of their family?
There
are always intended / unintended consequences of how an MP votes in that it
will impact their own financial affairs or that of their family in an
intentional or unintentional way.
A
recent report from The Times has brought this topic right back on the agenda
again with an article relating to George Osborne. Let’s be really frank here,
if anyone needs to be transparent with their business and family business
interests it has to be the Chancellor of the Exchequer. We have to trust
without any doubt that tax changes, economic policy changes, stimulus measures,
etc. are for the good of the UK.
Yet
did you know that Osborne is a shareholder in a high-end wallpaper and furnishing
company (Osborne & Little) and held the shareholding during his time as an
MP and Chancellor of the Exchequer?
Osborne
was part of the Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron's team that
campaigned to keep the UK in Europe last year. The 'Remain' camp was slammed
for scaremongering voters with warnings of mass job losses and tax hikes if the
UK left Europe. Interestingly, ‘remain’ was also the right decision for his
business interest in Osborne & Little due to their overseas trading.
Just
one small example of how the lack of transparency raises questions and doubt.
We have 650 MP’s that have a similar lack of openness.
If
we are going to restore faith in the political system and MP’s individually,
let’s raise the bar on transparency and get MP’s to publish their business and
family business interests on their websites. We can then all make educated
judgements as to whether the consequences of their voting are intended or
unintended.
Not
too much to ask is it?
No comments:
Post a Comment